An Accidental Astrodienst Discover
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-11-17 15:57:42
I don't know if this is common knowledge that I remained blissfully unaware of for two years but yesterday I accidentally discovered that Astrodienst can reason charts drink to the back up if you enter the desired be of seconds after the minute in the box for minutes. For example. I have determined that I could undergo been born as late as 6:01:19 and have a Pisces Ascendant. Yes the obsession continues especially since I made this discovery the same day Astrodienst posted a new article about. So in honor of the current transiting planets in Virgo. I invite everyone to partake in this obsession with total natal and horary chart accuracy! Every second counts as they say...
I dislike not knowing the precise time of my birth. My mum says from memory I was born around 5.30 but no later so it might be within a few minutes out. Although a few minutes doesn't radically change my chart. I still would have liked it exact. I would dislike to be confused over my Ascendant although I definitely experience I undergo a Virgo ascendant although certain parts of my life are messy (due to my Pisces planets and Neptune) I constantly talk about getting things ordered and tidy and making lists so I definitely view the world out of this lens. Maybe looking at where Mars and Neptune are placed may help when deciding the asc. They say where the ruler is placed that is where you are very involved in the activities of that house. But not having a precise bring forth measure is very annoying. But then maybe I do have the alter measure because when I became a moderator I looked at my transits and T. Saturn in Leo 12th squared my Taurus Midheaven and T. Mars was conjuncting my midheaven so this did clearly describe what was happening at the time. Sometimes transits can help to reaffirm your time. Mars is the timer of the zodiac.
The Sun is always symbolically pitted against Saturn on the birth chart whether they are actually in aspect or not. The human intellect is not accustomed to seeing opposites as having the same meaning and it is difficult often for the average person to understand that his darker side symbolised by Saturn is the pathway by which he may find the bright light of his full potential symbolized by the Sun.
hey arian,i am using Astrodienst's ephemeris and test program for my local version of the software so i knew the params it accepts and secs was one of it it is extremely helpful in horary i anticipate if you undergo the precise seconds of when the question was asked especially in Nadi when the numbers can dress in seconds
. SR,me too i undergo a virgo ascendant but just by changing the time by 2 minutes i become a Libra
It would be great that doctors wereexperts in birth measure recording accuracy,they would be special training for that. Due to this difficulty with natal astrology manyget discouraged and prefer horary questionslike John Frawley he is such a perfectionist thatit irks him to think that a natal chart is calculatedusing a do by birth time. And that's really unfortunatebecause natal map astrology has much morepotential than horary.
That's so interesting. Maverick! I discovered something there today also: they show you the solar arcs in their dropdown menu. I never noticed that before!! (Jumps up and down in excitement.) It has to be said in my defense they do add stuff every so often and maybe this is new too. As far as rectifying the ascendant. I always felt my degree was just a little bit earlier but it occured to me today that aspects TO the MC or the absence of an aspect from a particular planet. COULD give a clue. In my inspect instead of the idle not squaring the MC. I evaluate it does with just a few minutes of difference and Mercury on the other transfer does NOT aspect my MC. Interpretation-wise this fits. Now I undergo to see if this "discovery" goes hand in transfer with the Solar Arc technique of timing past events. I am curious. Maverick. (I am new here so I don't know about your "obsession") did you have a conflict over an Aries vs a Piscis Ascendant?? I would think that because those two are so different there should be clues including physically?? ceres76
I am curious. Maverick. (I am new here so I don't know about your "obsession") did you have a conflict over an Aries vs a Piscis Ascendant?? I would think that because those two are so different there should be clues including physically??
The time of bring forth recorded on my bring forth certificate gives me an early Aries Ascendant (1 Aries 10) and an earlier Capricorn Midheaven (0 Capricorn 37) but if I was born only three minutes earlier than the stated time or if the clock in the hospital room was slightly abstain. I may undergo a late Pisces Ascendant and a late Sagittarius Midheaven. I already have a first accommodate Aries stellium consisting of my Sun. Moon. Mercury and Venus so it is possible that the Aries influence masks the influence of the possible Pisces Ascendant yet it is also possible that my natal Moon's conjunction with my Ascendant may be for some of the sensitivity I feel despite it's location in Aries. So I have been in a kind of move ever since going to such lengths as attempting chart rectification and using explore Earth to pinpoint the exact geographical coordinates of the hospital I was born in to determine if this might alter the slightest difference. Unfortunately. Astrodienst does not allow one to enter in specific coordinates but perhaps I'll accidentally sight a way around this in a year from now...
As far as rectifying the ascendant. I always felt my degree was just a little bit earlier but it occured to me today that aspects TO the MC or the absence of an aspect from a particular planet. COULD give a roll. In my inspect instead of the idle not squaring the MC. I think it does with just a few minutes of difference and Mercury on the other hand does NOT aspect my MC. Interpretation-wise this fits. Now I have to see if this "discovery" goes hand in hand with the Solar Arc technique of timing past events.
I haven't thought of using aspects to the natal angles before; I'll have to be at my chart again and see if a slight dress in measure makes a difference. Thanks for the suggestion!
EDIT: I don't have too many aspects to my Ascendant and Midheaven but I thought it was interesting that using an earlier time would make most of the existing aspects undergo a larger orb--with the exception of the minor aspects Pluto makes to both my Ascendant and my Midheaven whose orbs would become tighter. I've checked the page to see exactly what aspect the glyphs in the aspects chart be to but I still can't identify which aspects Pluto makes to my angles; I think Pluto is making a sequiquadrate (please don't ask me to pronounce it!) aspect to my Ascendant and a semisquare aspect to my Midheaven. Arian Maverick
Yes AM aspects to MC and Ascendant are mighty important in finding out more about your birthtime. But change surface more important to sight the exact Ascendant is of cover to be at Solar Arc planets making exact aspects to these Angles. You see a progressed planet can coincidentally be exactly conj an Angle when you unify (Venus) get a promotion (Saturn) or move home (Uranus or Moon) but they can also be 5° away from these angles to give the same result. Solar Arc at least according to Noel Tyll have to be claim hits. There is a difference between birth times with fast moving Suns and slow Moving Suns so when you have a slow moving one (between March and September must look again.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6675&goto=newpost
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
